kensi seamus (derbyshire) ***@gmail.com WINNER - KOTM July 2012
posted as news in <k2tmfe$73f$***@speranza.aioe.org>
and in: http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com.au/2012/08/winners-usenet-kook-awards-july-2012.html
Do you have any idea how ridiculous that makes you look?
i do know how angry it gets you seeing the TRVTH posted, derbyshire.
Also, you fucked up the References: header of your post, and as a result
it's threading incorrectly.
nope.
that would be that stupid POS you insist on using (and the source of all
your woes) not getting the color coords to suit your view...heh
when you work out how the ooznetz works...do wade through your foam to
find a single relevant piece of information that could be substantiated.
i wager you come up empty handed!
You might want to fix0r that fucked software
you use that can't count lines properly or recognize correctly-formed
sig delimiters. Apparently it also occasionally forgets to append, to
the References: header of the post being replied to, that post's MID,
resulting in your post appearing as a sibling of, instead of a followup
to, that post, and resulting in *you* looking like an even bigger fool
in public than usual.
Post by Pauland in: http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com.au/2012/08/winners-usenet-kook-awards-july-2012.html
Postediting too now, ko0ky? Fix0red.
yew cannot dodge the TRVTH...asshole.
Post by Paulaside from the fact you - as an award winning kook - have no status in
any function of the AUK ballot process, thereby now adding "fraudster"
to your long list of oooznetz criminalities, there is the small matter of you
not addressing unfinished business in your last socky appearance.
both your OP and that lame sock appearance are challenged here.
Far from being a kook, she's an FNVW that has been nominated for a
Hammer of Thor. Or hadn't you noticed, net abuser?
oh you are a "kook" alright.
Confused much, ko0ky? We were talking about your allegation that
*Nadegda* was a kook. Do at least *try* to keep up.
Post by Paulno doubt at all about that.
As one of the four co-FNVWs, I am most assuredly not a k00k.
Post by Paulread it sunshine...you have no status in any AUK business, no matter what
"nym" you post under.
As one of the four co-FNVWs, I have the status to say "Shut it, ko0ky"
to the likes of you.
Post by Paul-- not that she'd sue, since that sort of thing tends to be more the
province of k00ks like you. That doesn't make your defamatory assertion
any less a wrongdoing on your part, though.
there aint nothing defamatory about TRVTH, kook.
How about if I tell you that you continue to fail English spelling,
grammar, and reading comprehension? That defamatory? There's a typo in
your sentence above, in fact.
Meanwhile, if you're asserting a "truth" defense, your mission, should
you choose to accept it, is to prove beyond a reasonable doubt -- the
standards applied in all civilized criminal courts -- that Nadegda is a)
guilty of larceny by deceit and b) additionally guilty of at least 1
other act that is widely regarded as criminal among Western democracies.
Of course, should you or any member of your team of other sockpuppets
Hydra-Blanket, CastAlone, _kookmeister_, Flash, et. al. be SPNAKed or
TOSsed, the [Tor] FNVW {1 of 4} shall disavow all knowledge of your actions.
This message won't self-destruct in six days, because I am not an
XNA-abusing coward.
Post by Paulthat said...your dependence on the State for survival kind
Proof, ko0ky?
Post by Paulof rules you out of any possibility of litigating, anyone..[snarf]
Proof, ko0ky? The last time I checked, the law applies equally to rich
and poor, so even Emmett Gulley would have the right to sue someone if
he had a valid cause of action.
Of course, I have no intention of suing anyone (and where did I ever
suggest otherwise? MID, ko0ky?) and I seriously doubt Nadegda does
either. Filing k00ksuits would be more your speed, ko0ky.
Post by Paulthere is the small matter of you not addressing unfinished business in your
last socky appearance.
That post's by me, not Nadegda,
one and the same, as proven repeatedly...sockyboi.
MID, ko0ky?
Post by Pauland I don't see what "unfinished business" you are babbling about.
"[ Note: The other poster has stolen my nym, in case you
think it's strange you're getting another answer... :-)
There's no convincing the guy, I'm not who he thinks I am,
but USENET is just a tiny insane asylum and what do you expect. ]"
the business of you claiming i stole your name, paula.
the obvious" in response to that claim.
nope.
you cannot read for shit, kook.
you get your "paul" sock fired up...otherwise we are done here...
And your trollishly randomly adding a xpost to alt.argus when you
replied comes back to bite you now, because that allowed your post,
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134757448600
SPNAK!
Post by Pauldo get your "paul" sock out and start posting your arguments as to
that will be something worth a few keystrokes.
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with OS/2, ko0ky?
Post by Paulboth your OP and that lame sock appearance are challenged here.
Actually, that was not a "challenge", it was you dodging the points I
raised in that other post, by a) backpedaling furiously away from your
snipping and ignoring everything else, such as me pointing out that you
are the #1 source of the noise you claim you seek to eliminate from
aioe.news.helpdesk and alt.free.newsservers.
the evidence says otherwise, kook.
as does the thousands of abuse postings you have made to many groups
over many years...yer net-abusing fucktard.
Liar.
oh Really..!!..why the >100 lines of foamage, kook?
i say ye doth protest way too much!
[guffaw]
--
# 1 - "I'M NOT DERBYSHIRE!!!1!!
# 2 - "I AM [Sock A] NOT [Sock B]!!2!!
# 3 - "Proof?"
# 4 - "YOU'RE CHASING A GHOST!!4!!"
# 5 - "YOU'RE DRINKING THE MORPHY KOOL-AID!!5!!"
# 6 - "We've spanked you again - VICTOLLY IS OURS!!!6!!"
# 7 - "I'M WINNING, FOR FUCK' SAKE!!7!!" (from MID <jutal1$4u1$***@dont- email.me>)
# 8 - Point to the [Tard] Peg Boi's Palmjobs and call them 'evidence' or 'spanks'.
# 9 - Display mental retardation and insanity by regurgitating a Tholenism.
#10 - When spanked six ways to Sunday, reply to each sockpuppet diddling insane
screed and call it 'Our So0pa Sekkkret Unkrackable Kode'.
#11 - When spanked, make a faux award nomination and second it by Holey Sock.
#12 - PeeWee - vermin's big misadventure.
#13 - Swim deeply in denial.